• Prior airport-operation experience was no longer required. • No cap was placed on how many of the six airports one bidder could win. • The bid parameter shifted from revenue-share to a flat per-passenger fee.
DEA recommended a maximum of two airports per bidder on 10 Dec 2018; NITI Aayog warned that a bidder “lacking sufficient technical capacity can well jeopardise the project.” PPPAC proceeded anyway on 11 Dec, ruling prior experience “may neither be made a prerequisite for bidding, nor a post-bid requirement.”
Outcome: Adani Enterprises, with zero prior airport experience, won all six airports.
For decades, defence construction restrictions kept the sun-blasted Rann of Kutch off-limits to renewable developers. That changed fast. On 21 April 2023, defence ministry officials, the Army, MNRE, and Gujarat agreed to allow wind turbines from 1–2 km of the India–Pakistan border, hybrid plants from 2–8 km. By 8 May 2023, the MoD had circulated guidelines extending comparable relaxations to borders with China, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Myanmar. The Guardian reported that the BJP had 'lobbied at the highest levels' for the rule change.
SECI — state-owned, present at the April meeting — held the largest allotment: 23,000 hectares inside what would become the 445 sq km Khavda Renewable Energy Park. In July 2023, SECI wrote to Gujarat authorities seeking to surrender that parcel. Gujarat reclaimed it. Adani Green Energy subsequently expanded into the park and now holds approximately 19,000 hectares — roughly 9.5 GW of planned capacity.
The park is not an Adani-only project: NTPC holds ~4,750 MW; GSECL, GIPCL, SECI, and Suzlon's Sarjan Realties also have parcels. The government's rebuttal rests on exactly this: a general infrastructure policy, multiple PSUs. What it has not explained is why SECI surrendered land made significantly more valuable by a relaxation SECI itself helped negotiate.
A consistent pattern recurs across sectors — safeguards proposed by the government's own technical arms were removed and Adani benefited. The pattern is real. The intent behind it is, as yet, unproven.
— Fact-check summary verdict